
Four years ago, when Lori Lightfoot ran against Toni Preckwinkle, both women stood to make history as the first black female mayor. Between the two, I favored Lightfoot based on her sensibility, fairness, and (seemingly) humility. With Lightfoot married to a white woman, it added a unifying effect of the gay community, plus racial harmony. What potential. It was thrilling enough that I enlisted a friend of mine to partake in an undercover caper of stealing one of her campaign signs for my suburban patio.
However, during Lightfoot’s reign, her potential quickly began to crumble. There was a major lack of humility with shouting, swearing, and insulting her colleagues. Lightfoot’s decision to exclude white reporters for her mid-term inauguration demonstrated racial division despite her reasoning about systemic racism. It did not seem logical to consider Lightfoot a racist, but I wondered if her wife had any influence over her to set her straight (no pun intended). The People spoke on election day and hopefully Lightfoot reflects and gets on the right foot herself. (Pun intended.)

It seemed that Jesus “Chuy” Garcia could be a natural bridge between black and white, however, his campaign seemed a bit lackluster and pundits claimed he entered the race too late. Personally, I thought Ald. Sophia King was like a breath of fresh air as the only other female candidate compared to Lightfoot, with sound plans. Ja’mal Green caused chuckles throughout one of the debates when he claimed the other candidates stole all his ideas and they were too old. Pundits predict he has a bright political future. Despite Ald. Roderick Sawyer and State Rep. Kam Buckner’s political ties, their connections didn’t surpass other candidates.
Why not Willie Wilson? A good commercial. All the candidates had plans on how to make Chicago safer and investing in youth, etc. The bigger question was “How are you going to pay for it?” Wilson is known for spending his own money and not about dumping a load on taxpayers. He wanted to run the government like a business and fire Lightfoot. She blasted him for the comment about letting police hunt criminals like rabbits. However, Wilson resonates with many. All of the defeated candidates still play a part in the election by their endorsements.

The recent first mayoral runoff forum between Paul Vallas and Brandon Johnson showed their different approaches on solutions for public safety, the number one issue throughout the whole campaign. The two candidates surprisingly have many opinions in common about many issues, however, their methods differ. Their campaign approaches, positive or negative, may also impact some voters after Lightfoot’s implosion.
Vallas wants to run a positive campaign but needs to defend himself promptly against attacks. On a recent episode of “Flannery Fired Up,” Johnson claimed that Vallas wants to remove black history from schools. Vallas explained that he expanded black history to be part of the school curriculum, not just one month. However, during a recent runoff forum, it was brought up twice by Johnson before Vallas finally defended himself. It’s unfortunate, but wise, that Vallas’s recent commercials are attacking Johnson, but we must remember that attack ads win over lots of voters.
Johnson’s continuous attacks on Vallas accusing him of being a Republican may backfire. Democrats in a blue state should not take that their home-court advantage for granted. There are many Republicans in Illinois that are looking for a hint of conservatism and a moderate Democrat is their likely choice. Moderate candidates show a willingness to work with the other side. Cooperation is what we need, not further division. Learn more about both candidates at paulvallas2023.com and brandonjohnsonforchicago.com.

















